II 2(E) of AGC draft) Discovery (MCR 9.115). This summary addresses only five key issues upon which mere is major disagreement: Grounds for discipline (9.104(A)) Administrator's ability to obtain medical records (MCR 9. Since the submission of the two Versions, there have been additional minor technical corrections to the AGC version, mostly made following discussion by the Court. AGC staff submitted a revised proposal which maintained certain, proposed rules disapproved by the SBM's workgroup, added new provisions, and corrected language.
The SBM proposal was submitted to the Court on August 6, 2009. A Bar president-appointed workgroup submitted its proposal to the Board of Commissioners, which was adopted on July 24, 2009. At its April 9, 2009, administrative conference, the Court requested the State Bar of Michigan (SBM) to provide input on the proposed rules to the Court within 120 days. In the fall of 2006, pursuant to the direction of the AOC, the Grievance Administrator submitted comprehensive revisions of Chapter 9 of the Michigan Court rules, the attorney disciplinary procedural rules, to the Michigan Supreme Court for its consideration. This summary of the key differences between the recommendations for change to the attorney discipline rules submitted by the Attorney Grievance Commission (AOC) and those submitted by the State Bar is offered jointly by the AGC and the Bar to assist the Court in its deliberations.
0 kommentar(er)
